Quelltext der Seite +sv clockcorrection msecs 0

++ Dieser Bug wurde am 04.12.2012 von Valve mit einen Patch beseitigt ++

== Interpolate Bug FIX bei CKRAS [[CS:GO]] aktiv ==

Wir haben den Interpolate Bug FIX für alle CounterStrike Global Offensive Server aktiviert, auf diesen [[zBlock]] Programmierer im offiziellen [[Valve]] Forum verwiesen hat. Wir wollen Euch damit die Möglichkeit bieten, dass ihr selber optional mit einen Neustart im [[Webinterface]], den Interpolate Bug Fix für [[CS:GO]] aktiviert.
<br><br>
Zitat: <br>
Cvar "sv_clockcorrection_msecs" defaults to "60"<br>
So this is something I discussed a while ago, as spotting this in the SDK struck me as somewhat odd. The result was in VALVE not changing this.<br>
I understand why there is a need for jitter correction like this, but I've never liked this implementation.<br>
I feel it should be down to the client to decide how much they need, this basically performs the same feature as "cl_interp" but isn't being configurable.<br><br>

All zBlock match-servers currently have this set to "30" and Verygames DM have been running with "0" on their servers for months now.<br>
It's also presently set at 0 in a couple of competitive league configs.<br><br>

If you were to remove this cvar (or set it to 0 in CSGO) I'd be happy if the result was more relaxed cl_interp restrictions, so that "cl_interp_ratio" could be between 1 and 3, instead of the current forced competitive values min 1 and max 2.<br><br>

Reducing this value should have the largest impact on the game for competitive players.<br>
For example I have a average jitter of between 2-10ms on my home Internet connection and a latency of about 15ms to many game servers.<br>
There is no need for me to have the 60ms jitter correction, it's increasing position latency by about 4x! So I could easily get away without the jitter correction and rely on a tiny amount of extrapolation.<br><br>

If I wanted a slightly smoother more accurate game I could increase cl_interp_ratio to 2.<br>
I'd really appreciate it if this in particular could be reviewed."<br><br>
<youtube>y_WZD3s7FFg</youtube>

[[Datei:Beispiel.jpg|center]]<br>
Wir würden uns über Euer Feedback in unserem [https://forum.ckras.com/thread.php?threadid=3521 Forum] oder via support @ ckras . com freuen.